#ANTIVIRUS BITDEFENDER FREE FULL#
#ANTIVIRUS BITDEFENDER FREE PRO#
#ANTIVIRUS BITDEFENDER FREE PC#

#ANTIVIRUS BITDEFENDER FREE FULL#

When we ran an Avira full scan, the OpenOffice test completion time increased to 10:25. A Bitdefender quick scan resulted in a faster time of 8:40. During an Avira quick scan, that increased to 9 minutes flat.

Without any antivirus program running, the Acer Aspire E1 completed our test in 8 minutes and 35 seconds. Our OpenOffice test yielded comparable results. Bitdefender’s full scan saw a drop, too, but it was lighter than Avira’s, at 1,669. (Higher is better.)ĭuring Avira’s full antivirus scan, the PCMark 7 score dropped much more steeply, to 1,447. A Bitdefender Antivirus Plus quick scan, by comparison, had an even lighter impact, resulting in 2,155. During an Avira Free Antivirus quick scan, that score dropped slightly, to 2,118. We used two different performance tests on each program: one established by PCMark 7 benchmarking software, and our own custom OpenOffice test that matches 20,000 names with addresses.īefore any antivirus program was installed, the Acer Aspire E1 scored a 2,172 on PCMark 7. That’s why we tested the performance impact of Avira Free Antivirus and Bitdefender Antivirus Plus while they scanned for malware.īoth were run on the same Windows 8 Acer Aspire E1 laptop, which featured an Intel Core i3 processor and 4GB of RAM.

#ANTIVIRUS BITDEFENDER FREE PC#

No matter the features or the malware-detection capabilities, no one wants a program that slows down a PC every time it’s run. Bitdefender offers slightly stronger zero-day malware protection, but the free product is just about as robust.

#ANTIVIRUS BITDEFENDER FREE PRO#

Pitted against samples of zero-day malware (which antivirus engines have never before encountered), Avira Antivirus Pro caught 99 percent, while Bitdefender Internet Security scored 100 percent.īoth products scored over the industry averages for widespread detection (99 percent) and zero-day detection (96 percent). The results should be comparable to the products we’re assessing here.ĪV-Test found that both Avira Antivirus Pro and Bitdefender Internet Security were able to catch 100 percent of the widespread, common malware that AV-Test threw at them. These are higher-tier versions of Avira Free Antivirus and Bitdefender Antivirus Plus 2015, respectively, but they use the same antivirus engines as the less expensive products. In an October 2014 study conducted on Windows 8.1, AV-Test looked at and. Now to the heart of the issue: Which product is better at detecting and stopping malware?įor that we turn to AV-Test, an independent German lab that regularly assesses major antivirus programs. Its interface is easier to use and more attractive. Bitdefender’s widget is a slick gunmetal-gray circle that only indicates the computer’s protection status: green for all’s good, yellow for warning, red for problem.

If you only have Avira Free Antivirus, however, some of these icons will be grayed out. Avira’s is a rectangle that pops out of the icon bar, and is designed to be a table of contents for all Avira products installed on a computer. It’s got a gunmetal-gray interface with blue accents and large square icons marking its feature categories, and is both easier on the eyes and easier to navigate from the get-go.īoth products include desktop widgets that provide a quick way to access the full program’s features. Bitdefender Antivirus Plus has a bit more flash.

Antivirus bitdefender free